The Bombay High Court in the case of Nikhil Patt and Ors. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr. has held that even if an application for alteration of charge is filed by the prosecution,

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Vinayak Purushottam Dube (deceased) through LRs. v/s Jayashree Padamkar Bhatt & Ors. has held that the legal representatives of a deceased are not liable to discharge contractual obligations

The NCLT, Ahmedabad in the case of Shalabh Kumar Daga Liquidator of Silver Proteins Pvt Ltd vs. Himanshu J Domadia has held that as per Regulation 35A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Manisha Mahendra Gala & Ors vs Shalini Bhagwan Avatramani & Ors stands as a testament to the nuanced considerations entailed in resolving disputes pertaining to property rights

Recently, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, Government of India has released an Office Memorandum (“ Office Memorandum ”) mandating insertion of Rule 227A in the General Financial Rules, 2017 (“ GFR Rules 2017 ”).

Parties to an agreement are required to pay stamp duty in accordance with the relevant stamp law. Unstamped agreements are not admissible in evidence. In commercial transactions especially concerning real estate, the amount of stamp duty is considerable.

We have often heard that it is beneficial to nominate someone in your financial assets, primarily to secure the next of kin or the ones otherwise dependent on you.